Swapna Gannabathulaa, Geoffrey W. Krissansena, Liana Bisson-Rowea, Margot Skinnerb, Gregor Steinhornc, Ralf Schlothauerc (2016): Different Honeys Differ Greatly in Immunostimulatory Activity

Kalender next 42tg

Montag Mai 20 - All Day
-i- UNO Weltbienentag 20.05

Event Kalender

«

<

April 2024

>

»

Banners

Aktuelle Seite: Home

Bienenprodukte

Apitherapie

Swapna Gannabathulaa, Geoffrey W. Krissansena, Liana Bisson-Rowea, Margot Skinnerb, Gregor Steinhornc, Ralf Schlothauerc (2016): Different Honeys Differ Greatly in Immunostimulatory Activity

Veröffentlicht: Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2016 07:27 | Geschrieben von Super User | Drucken | E-Mail | Zugriffe: 3254

Titel	Different Honeys Differ Greatly in Immunostimulatory Activity
Subtitel	Correlation of the immunostimulatory activities of honeys with their contents of identified bioactives
Author	Swapna Gannabathulaa, Geoffrey W. Krissansena, Liana Bisson-Rowea, Margot Skinnerb, Gregor Steinhornc, Ralf Schlothauerc

Abstract	Honeys with unique compositions and properties are worth studying for their health-promoting effects. In order to correlate bioactive content with immunostimulatory activity we compared the abilities of seventy eight New Zealand and non-New Zealand honeys to stimulate blood monocytes to release tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and examined the compositions of selected honeys that had widely varying activities. All the honeys, except for a Malaysian "Amber honey" stimulated the release of TNF-α from monocytes. However, the honeys differed greatly in their immunostimulatory activity, even within the same honey type. They differed in their contents of immunostimulatory components, including apalbumins, arabinogalactan proteins, and apisimin, whose levels did not correlate exactly with immunostimulatory activities. We suggest that the immunostimulatory properties of honey may be influenced by other factors, including unidentified immunostimulatory bioactives and immunosuppressive components; the bioavailability of some bioactives may depend on unidentified factors.
Methods
Results
Conclusions

dx.doi.org / URL	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.038
Published	Food Chemistry - Volume 221, 15 April 2017, Pages 39–46

Food Chemistry

| Kategorie: Wissen / Apitherapie

Phänologie

Primel (Primula Vulgaris)
(Erwartet seit 64 Tag(en))
Huflattich (Tussilago farfara)
(Erwartet seit 44 Tag(en))
Sternhyazinthen (Chionodoxa)
(Erwartet seit 39 Tag(en))
Kornelkirsche (Cornus mas)
(Erwartet seit 34 Tag(en))
Tulpen (Tulipa)
(Erwartet seit 30 Tag(en))
Gelbe Narzisse (Narcissus pseudonarcissus)
(Erwartet seit 28 Tag(en))
Busch-Windröschen (Anemone nemorosa)
(Erwartet seit 27 Tag(en))
Mahonie (Mahonia aquifolium)
(Erwartet seit 18 Tag(en))
Gewöhnliche Traubenkirsche (Prunus padus)
(Erwartet seit 7 Tag(en))
Raps (Brassica napus)
(In 2 Tag(en))
Rosskastanie (Aesculus hippocastanum)
(In 6 Tag(en))
Immergrüne Lorbeer-Kirsche (Prunus laurocerasus)
(In 7 Tag(en))
Linde (latin linde)
(In 36 Tag(en))

Bee WISE !! Bee INFO…

bee the campaign

Newsticker

Kalender next 42tg

Event Kalender

Banners

Swapna Gannabathulaa, Geoffrey W. Krissansena, Liana Bisson-Rowea, Margot Skinnerb, Gregor Steinhornc, Ralf Schlothauerc (2016): Different Honeys Differ Greatly in Immunostimulatory Activity

Phänologie

aktualisierte Beiträge

Wetter

who is online

Mo	Di	Mi	Do	Fr	Sa	So
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	1	2	3	4	5

Mo	Di	Mi	Do	Fr	Sa	So
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	1	2	3	4	5

Mo	Di	Mi	Do	Fr	Sa	So
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	1	2	3	4	5